Submit-traumatic Stress Dysfunction (PTSD) options three principal signs: (1) re-experiencing the trauma, (2) avoidance of trauma reminders, and (3) a persistent sense of menace (Karatzias et al., 2017; Veic, 2025) and sometimes impacts navy personnel (Provan et al., 2024).
The usual therapies for PTSD embrace drugs (e.g., serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs), psychotherapy (e.g., cognitive processing remedy; CPT), and eye motion desensitisation and reprocessing, often called EMDR (Provan et al., 2024). Many veterans face obstacles to accessing care (Rozek et al., 2023; Veic, 2023), and curiosity in equine-assisted companies (EAS) for this inhabitants is rising. EAS makes use of horses for remedy, studying, and horsemanship, which might alleviate psychological well being points like melancholy or nervousness (Earles et al., 2015).
The present research (Provan et al., 2024) aimed to:
- Conduct a scientific overview to evaluate the advantages of equine-assisted companies (EAS) on PTSD symptom severity in navy veterans and,
- Look at short-term outcomes, intervention high quality, entry obstacles, and outcomes throughout and after therapy.
With obstacles to conventional PTSD therapies, equine-assisted companies (EAS) are gaining consideration as a possible remedy choice for veterans, and this new research examines the prevailing proof base.
Strategies
Search technique
The systematic overview the Most popular Reporting Objects for Systematic Opinions and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) pointers (Web page et al., 2021) however was not prospectively registered. The unique analysis was reviewed on equine-assisted remedy (EAT) for PTSD in peer-reviewed journals utilizing PubMed, JSTOR, and Science Direct. Discrepancies had been resolved by way of dialogue among the many authors, and duplicates had been eliminated utilizing Excel.
Kinds of research
The preliminary search targeted on randomised managed trials (RCTs), however this was expanded to incorporate all research designs as a result of restricted variety of RCTs, with no restrictions on evaluation timing.
Kinds of comparators
Comparators included: 1) no therapy; 2) pre-EAT; and three) post-EAT therapy.
Kinds of end result measures
The first end result was PTSD severity, assessed utilizing the PTSD Guidelines for DSM-5 (PCL-5) or PCL-Veterans/Navy (PCL-V-M) (Weathers et al., 2013), each pre- and post-EAT therapy. A secondary qualitative evaluation of wellbeing was included, together with assessments of significant modifications in PTSD scores.
Inclusion standards targeted on navy veterans with PTSD/ethical harm handled with equine-assisted remedy. Exclusions had been youngsters, civilian populations, different psychological well being issues, remedy involving different animals, and non-peer-reviewed articles.
Knowledge extraction and synthesis
Duplicate research had been eliminated, adopted by screening titles and abstracts for relevance, and any discrepancies had been resolved by way of dialogue. A scientific bibliography overview recognized extra related articles. Knowledge extracted included creator particulars, research traits, affected person demographics, EAS packages, outcomes (PTSD scores pre- and post-EAS therapy and clinician-administered PTSD scores; CAPS-5). Different qualitative outcomes included accomplice involvement, peer help, obstacles and outcomes to EAS programmes, and extra advantages of EAS (e.g., alternatives for reflection).
Danger of bias evaluation
Danger of bias was evaluated utilizing RoB2 for RCTs (Higgins et al., 2011), ROBINS-I for non-randomised interventional research (Sterne et al., 2016), and ROBINS-E (Higgins et al., 2024) for one observational research. Two authors independently assessed bias and resolved discrepancies by way of dialogue.
Statistical evaluation
PTSD scores measured through PCL from greater than three research had been eligible for meta-analysis utilizing RevMan 4.0 software program with a random results mannequin. Imply variations and 95% confidence intervals had been reported. Heterogeneity was assessed utilizing I², Chi², or Tau² statistics. Regardless of solely two research offering CAPS-5 scores, a meta-analysis was additionally performed for these scores utilizing the identical parameters as PCL.
Outcomes
Searches of three databases yielded 111 outcomes: 12 from PubMed, 25 from JSTOR, and 74 from Science Direct. In complete, there have been 13 related research to handle the analysis query: is EAS useful for navy veterans with PTSD?
Examine traits confirmed that the included research, printed between 2016 and 2023, principally originated from the US (11 research), with one every from Australia and Israel. Amongst them, two had been RCTs, 11 had been scientific research (analysis, pilot, and open trials), and one was observational. The whole participant rely throughout research was 344, predominantly male (76%), aged 37–58 years. EAS sorts included therapeutic horseback driving (THR) and psychotherapy involving horses (PIH), together with combos of equine-assisted studying (EAL).
Danger of bias evaluation indicated that whereas the RCTs had a low danger of bias, interventional research confirmed 30% with low danger, 60% with some considerations, and 10% at excessive danger. Issues had been famous notably in participant choice bias.
Sort of EAS therapy revealed that eight research used PIH, involving actions with horses alongside psychotherapy. Groundwork, grooming, and driving had been widespread actions, with variations in psychotherapy strategies. Driving period correlated with better alleviation of PTSD signs. Some research mixed EAL with PIH, and therapy frequency various from intensive choices to weekly periods, spanning durations of 4-8 weeks or as much as 6 months.
9 research used the PTSD Guidelines (PCL) in numerous varieties (PCL-5, PCL-V, PCL-M), which assesses the 20 DSM-5 PTSD signs. Different measures included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) (Fisher et al., 2021), PACES, and PHQ-9 (Marchand et al., 2023).
Members had been recognized with PTSD, and the research confirmed short-term enhancements (as much as 6 months) in signs however lacked long-term follow-up. Enhancements in PTSD severity utilizing the PCL ranged from 4.02% to 50.68%, with a imply share enchancment of twenty-two.59%. Outcomes ought to be interpreted cautiously as a consequence of average to excessive dangers of bias and the dearth of standardized interventions.
A meta-analysis indicated a major discount in PTSD severity with a imply discount of 12.46 for PCL scores and 12.62 for CAPS-5 scores, highlighting the necessity for warning in decoding these findings as a result of low high quality of the research.
From the qualitative analyses the authors revealed additional findings. Research involving household in EAS phases confirmed optimistic outcomes in melancholy, stress, and high quality of life. Peer help was additionally famous as useful, offering social engagement amongst veterans. MRI research advised modifications in neural methods associated to PTSD after EAS. Different advantages included talent growth, relationship constructing, and private reflection, although these want confirming by way of high-quality research.
A overview of 13 research suggests equine-assisted companies (EAS) might scale back PTSD signs in veterans, however methodological limitations spotlight the necessity for higher-quality analysis.
Conclusions
The systematic overview and meta-analysis highlights numerous research assessing how working with horses can help in lowering signs of PTSD and bettering general well-being. The distinctive bond that may type between veterans and horses, together with the calming presence of those animals, is proven to supply therapeutic advantages.
By synthesising findings from a number of research, the overview presents an preliminary take a look at the potential benefits of this unconventional remedy, however agency conclusions can’t but be drawn.
Strengths and limitations
The research by Provan et al. (2024) offers invaluable insights into the potential advantages of equine-assisted companies (EAS) for navy veterans affected by PTSD. The authors developed a transparent and well-defined analysis query to evaluate an revolutionary strategy to psychological healthcare. By way of a scientific overview and meta-analysis, the researchers totally look at current analysis, uncovering each strengths and limitations of EAS as a therapy choice.
One important energy of the research is its complete synthesis of a number of research, which aggregates a considerable physique of proof and enhances the generalisability of the findings. This strategy permits the authors to guage traits and outcomes throughout numerous populations and settings, offering a broad perspective on the effectiveness of EAS for PTSD therapy. Moreover, the incorporation of quantitative evaluation permits for a extra goal measurement of the impact measurement of EAS on PTSD signs. This statistical methodology quantifies the advantages, providing extra concrete proof of the intervention’s effectiveness.
Regardless of its strengths, there are limitations to contemplate. The overview included research with various designs, methodologies, and participant traits, which complicates the interpretation of the outcomes. This heterogeneity can result in differing outcomes and makes it tough to determine a common conclusion relating to EAS. Solely two of the included research had been randomised managed trials (RCTs), and these had been very small research. General we want extra and bigger RCTs earlier than we are able to make certain that equine-assisted companies (EAS) are protected and efficient for treating PTSD in navy veterans.
Furthermore, many of the included research had been performed within the US, which has a special healthcare system to the UK and different EU nations as a consequence of privatisation. Though EAS is steadily making its look within the UK as a therapy choice for folks with extreme psychological sicknesses, it was shocking to see no related research on this overview. This will spotlight, that regardless of essential work being completed on this entrance within the UK, dissemination isn’t widespread or systematic, probably limiting consciousness amongst researchers, clinicians, and policymakers.
Moreover, most of the research reviewed had been of average to low high quality, with small pattern sizes and restricted management of confounding variables, elevating considerations concerning the robustness and generalisability of the findings. Most research targeted on short-term outcomes, leaving the long-term effectiveness of EAS unsure. The lack of long-term follow-up information makes it difficult to determine whether or not the advantages of EAS are sustained over time.
Lastly, the reliance on printed research raises the potential of publication bias, the place optimistic outcomes usually tend to be reported, probably skewing the general findings and overestimating the effectiveness of EAS.
Provan et al. (2024) spotlight the rising proof of equine-assisted companies for veterans with PTSD, however limitations in design and information high quality emphasise the necessity for extra rigorous investigation.
Implications for observe
This overview means that equine-assisted companies (EAS) might be a invaluable complementary or various therapy for PTSD, however the variability in research designs and the restricted long-term information point out that extra proof is required. The present proof base is essentially derived from small, non-randomised research. Subsequently, EAS ought to be regarded with warning and regarded an rising space of analysis relatively than a therapy prepared for widespread scientific use.
Integration into current therapeutic programmes. EAS has been explored as a potential adjunct in sure therapeutic contexts, notably the place standard/conventional therapies, equivalent to CBT or remedy, haven’t been efficient. Since EAS focuses on non-verbal interplay with horses, it might resonate with veterans who discover it tough to have interaction in additional standard therapies that contain discussing traumatic occasions. The therapeutic bond that varieties between veterans and horses may present an avenue for emotional expression, providing advantages equivalent to diminished nervousness and elevated emotions of empowerment. Psychological well being professionals might want to discover EAS in pilot or analysis contexts, i.e., service-related and high quality enchancment tasks, however widespread integration is untimely.
Multidisciplinary approaches. For EAS to be efficient, it should be a part of a holistic, multidisciplinary strategy to PTSD therapy. Collaborative care fashions that embrace psychological well being professionals, equine specialists, and veteran help companies may help be certain that EAS interventions are designed to fulfill veterans’ distinctive bodily, emotional, and psychological wants. Applicable coaching and certification for equine therapists can be crucial in any future scientific use of EAS to make sure that folks are receiving high-quality and evidence-based care.
Accessibility. EAS packages may be geographically and financially accessible to veterans throughout the nation, particularly given the agricultural or remoted areas the place many veterans reside.
Want for continued analysis and analysis. Given the research’s recognized limitations, practitioners ought to be cautious in absolutely endorsing EAS till extra sturdy and high-quality analysis confirms its long-term efficacy. Future research ought to purpose to standardise EAS protocols, incorporate numerous veteran populations, and discover the sustainability of its advantages over time. Equine-assisted companies might supply short-term advantages for veterans with PTSD, however stronger proof is required earlier than they are often advisable as a routine therapy choice.
Clinicians may discover equine-assisted companies as a potential complementary strategy for veterans with PTSD, however suggestions ought to await stronger proof from high-quality trials.
Assertion of pursuits
No conflicts of curiosity to declare.
Hyperlinks
Major paper
Provan, M., Ahmed, Z., Stevens, A. R., & Sardeli, A. V. (2024). Are equine-assisted services beneficial for military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry, 24(1), 544.
Different references
Earles, J. L., Vernon, L. L., & Yetz, J. P. (2015). Equine‐assisted therapy for anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of traumatic stress, 28(2), 149-152.
Fisher, P. W., Lazarov, A., Lowell, A., Arnon, S., Turner, J. B., Bergman, M., … & Neria, Y. (2021). Equine-assisted therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder among military veterans: an open trial. The Journal of Scientific Psychiatry, 82(5), 36449.
Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., … & Sterne, J. A. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. bmj, 343.
Higgins, J. P., Morgan, R. L., Rooney, A. A., Taylor, Ok. W., Thayer, Ok. A., Silva, R. A., … & Sterne, J. A. (2024). A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E). Atmosphere worldwide, 186, 108602.
Karatzias, T., Cloitre, M., Maercker, A., Kazlauskas, E., Shevlin, M., Hyland, P., … & Brewin, C. R. (2017). PTSD and Complex PTSD: ICD-11 updates on concept and measurement in the UK, USA, Germany and Lithuania. European journal of psychotraumatology, 8(sup7), 1418103.
Marchand, W. R., Lackner, R., Hartquist, A., Finnell, L., & Nazarenko, E. (2023). Evaluation of a mindfulness and self-compassion-based psychotherapy incorporating horses for Veterans who have experienced trauma. Complementary Therapies in Drugs, 72, 102914.
Web page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
Rozek, D. C., Steigerwald, V. L., Baker, S. N., Gross, G., Maieritsch, Ok. P., Hoff, R., … & Smith, N. B. (2023). Understanding veteran barriers to specialty outpatient PTSD clinical care. Journal of Nervousness Issues, 95, 102675.
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., … & Higgins, J. P. (2016). ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. bmj, 355.
Veic, A. (2023, August 15). Barriers to PTSD care for US veterans: new evidence highlights importance of an intersectional approach. The Psychological Elf. February 28, 2025.
Veic, A. (2025, January 29). Trauma clinicians weigh in: how physical exercise can support trauma treatment. The Psychological Elf. February 28, 2025.
Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2013). The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) national center for PTSD. Boston, MA, USA.
